National Homebrew Club Ireland

General Discussions => Education, Careers & Opportunities => Topic started by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 01:27:43 PM

Title: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 01:27:43 PM
http://www.czechminibreweries.com/12-steps-to-prosperous-brewery/

Sent to me by a Czech based friend who is heavily researching setting up a tourist-trail brewery- restaurant-bar in Ireland, Kildare
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: irish_goat on January 22, 2014, 01:31:08 PM
QuoteGet a quality microbrewery – with cheap brewing machine, made by some amateur from the neighborhood, its impossible to brew good beer

This guy obviously hasn't been to any NHC tastings.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 01:43:43 PM
 :)  to put in context they prob mean consistently :) they do have a whole section on temp control which needs good equipment, and to be reliable so as not to ruin a whole industrial batch. Any businessperson will tell u the importance of reliable, quality equipment not least reliable laptops and pcs.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: mr hoppy on January 22, 2014, 01:49:17 PM
This guy is selling breweries! Of course he's dissing the alternatives.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 01:52:42 PM
and at NHC tastings we get good, bad and in the middle beers!  :) that wont work in business.

On a slightly more serious note:
As we are all well aware, craft brewers are not consistently supplying great beers at the tap or in bottle. Myself and Kellie tasted a bottle (we wont publish which one) of a red ale by a popular Irish craft brewery and to be quite honest it went down the sink. Bottle was well in date and bought from a busy off licence. We will never ever know if the bottle ( or a keg) leaves the brewery in perfect shape and where it gets oxidised, lightstruck and / or infected, but from a business point of view, the brewery ( to stay in business long term) need to be responsible (however they do it) for the consumer getting a good / perfect bottle of beer to drink (especially at 2.95 for a 330ml)
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 01:55:09 PM
Quote from: mr happy on January 22, 2014, 01:49:17 PM
This guy is selling breweries! Of course he's dissing the alternatives.

+1 :)

read around theres some good info, ideas, photos, designs and sound advice. just keep in mind they sell all things brewing; and of course there is actually some terrible rubbish out there! as well as some overpriced great equipment :)
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: irish_goat on January 22, 2014, 01:58:18 PM
Quote from: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 01:52:42 PM
and at NHC tastings we get good, bad and in the middle beers!  :) that wont work in business.

Of course but there are a few among us who consistently produce great beer i.e. beer I would happily pay money for. In saying that, I've no evidence that they can consistently produce the same beer.

Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 02:04:30 PM
In a commercial setting consistency is important not just for the end user but for smooth and efficient production methods, time managment, cost management and energy management and I think that the meaning of the original quote you made, you wont make great commercial success with sub standard gear and the original statement related to microbrewery (multiple 1000-2000ltr vessels) opposed to nano-brewery or home brewery :)
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Tom on January 22, 2014, 02:31:40 PM
See, buying beer from a tiny brewery is nice, and the small fluctuations between batches is part of that. Acetic beer is a production flaw, and a weak and watery beer is arguably a recipe or process flaw. THAT is crap.

IMHO, crap beer is crap, off beer is bad, but slightly different beer is more than OK.

And while I'm here, the variation between one pint of Smithwicks and the next is much worse than my home brew consistency.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Hop Bomb on January 22, 2014, 02:39:28 PM
Re: flawed beer for sale - 99% of beer drinkers arent actively looking for flaws in beers though. I think this has a big impact on what gets out the door of a brewery. The irish times journo who wrote about that beautiful butterscotch lager they had at the ICBF is a perfect example.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Tom on January 22, 2014, 02:55:16 PM
You're kidding! I didn't see that, though I heard plenty about the wether's original overtones, alright!
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Hop Bomb on January 22, 2014, 03:34:32 PM
Im mistaken. It wasnt the Irish Times at all. http://thejournalist.ie/lifestyle-2/food-drink/food-drink-irish-craft-beer-cider-festival-review/
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Tom on January 22, 2014, 03:53:48 PM
I didn't attend, so I'm only saying, but if you're referring to "Lager X from Bru in Trim, Co. Meath was another very interesting beer with a lovely buttery quality", then it might not be diacetyl. I've had some ales described as buttery by a couple of half-serious drinkers, without any trace of diacetyl.

However, in the interest of science or somesuch, I'll rebrew the 'buttery' beer (that is how it's asked for) and see if my BJCP-honed nose detects diacetyl and report back. In a couple of months.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: irish_goat on January 22, 2014, 03:56:07 PM
That's the one, although to be fair, it got good reviews from experienced beer drinkers as well.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Hop Bomb on January 22, 2014, 04:07:44 PM
It was diacetyl.

Quote from: Tubomyces on September 10, 2013, 09:27:46 AM
Quote from: Dr Jacoby on September 10, 2013, 07:54:08 AM
Kudos to the guys at Bru who acknowledged one of their beers had way too much diacetyl. Very refreshing to meet such an honest brewer.
While technically flawed that beer, Lager X I think they called it, wasn't a write off, but he said he was going to give it to a local chipper to make beer batter.

He's a very straightforward guy, despite the fact that he was attacked by another brewer at the show, which he did nothing to warrant. He's also invited us up for a visit when they're all set up.

I just used this as an example of how most beer drinkers arent looking for flaws & probably cant identify them either.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 22, 2014, 04:15:42 PM
us bjcp trainee judges cant find half dem flaws either ::) and we r definatly looking for them.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: mr hoppy on January 22, 2014, 07:03:44 PM
Funny thing about flaws is, if you ask me the defining flavours of most lagers are so-called "flaws":
German - DMS
Czech - Diacetyl
Heineken - Isoamyl acetate
Budweiser - Acetlyaldehyde.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Tom on January 23, 2014, 09:08:13 AM
Roast Barley flavour is a flaw in a Dunkel (4B), but not a stout (13A-E). :)

Diacetyl and acetaldehyde, esters and phenolics are just fermentation characteristics, which can be a stylistic flaw in some beers, rather than a blanket flaw (such as Butyric or whatever the poo one was called).

Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: mr hoppy on January 23, 2014, 01:30:21 PM
What I was getting at is that the BJCP flaws etc. are there to allow judges to judge beers in competitions - they don't define good and bad beer.

If someone likes a touch of diacetyl in their pils, or roast barley in their dunkel that's their look out as long as they don't enter it in a BJCP comp.  :D

Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: Tom on January 23, 2014, 01:32:15 PM
They could probably slip a diacetyl beer past me no problem.
Title: Re: 12 steps to a prosperous brewery
Post by: brenmurph on January 23, 2014, 02:25:49 PM
Quote from: mr happy on January 23, 2014, 01:30:21 PM
What I was getting at is that the BJCP flaws etc. are there to allow judges to judge beers in competitions - they don't define good and bad beer.

If someone likes a touch of diacetyl in their pils, or roast barley in their dunkel that's their look out as long as they don't enter it in a BJCP comp.  :D

agree fully