National Homebrew Club Ireland

Brewing Discussions => All Grain Brewing => Topic started by: Archsnapper on May 27, 2016, 05:11:09 PM

Title: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 27, 2016, 05:11:09 PM
Three weeks ago I started a Brewdog recipe for Alpha Dog Red Ale which involved a mash at 65°C for 25 minutes and fermenting at 22°C. The recipe called for a California Ale yeast, but HBC sent me Mangrove Jacks M10 workhorse yeast. Anyway, it went mad for two days and then slowed way down only to come alive again about 10 days later. I'm taking hydrometer readings and yes, it's going down daily, beyond the target FG. It's now down at 1.004 and as of today I'm cold crashing it. I'm assuming that until the trub drops out I won't really be able to taste it properly ( ? )

The questions I have are: Has anyone else used M10 Workhorse yeast or is this symptomatic of contamination?
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: cruiscinlan on May 27, 2016, 06:36:43 PM
I used M10 for a barleywine and it got it from 1.12 to 1.020, having been built up as a starter first.  Never had a beer attenuate that low though, but ultimately just draw off a sample and taste it, only way to know really.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: BrewDorg on May 27, 2016, 06:39:54 PM
You mashed low and used a yeast that is known to attenuate very well. I don't think it has anything to do with a contamination, should be fine.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Frequent Sequence on May 27, 2016, 06:59:18 PM
just a sanity check here. Did you boil the wort?
if so: What was your OG?
I would expect a bit less fermentable wort with a short mash.
1.004 seem very low is your hydrometer calibrated?
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 27, 2016, 08:21:05 PM
That's the point - it seems quite mad. Yes, it was boiled, for 1 hour. The OG was 1042 ( target 1046). The hydrometer has appeared to be quite normal over numerous brews. Why on earth has it gone so low?
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Leann ull on May 27, 2016, 08:53:01 PM
You mashed too low, taste it, is it Ghandis sandal?
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 27, 2016, 09:35:54 PM
I followed Brewdog's recipe which called for that low mash.
I'm letting it clear a bit before the taste test.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Will_D on May 27, 2016, 11:07:17 PM
Quote from: Archsnapper on May 27, 2016, 05:11:09 PM
Three weeks ago I started a Brewdog recipe for Alpha Dog Red Ale which involved a mash at 65°C for 25 minutes and fermenting at 22°C. The recipe called for a California Ale yeast, but HBC sent me Mangrove Jacks M10 workhorse yeast. Anyway, it went mad for two days and then slowed way down only to come alive again about 10 days later. I'm taking hydrometer readings and yes, it's going down daily, beyond the target FG. It's now down at 1.004 and as of today I'm cold crashing it. I'm assuming that until the trub drops out I won't really be able to taste it properly ( ? )

The questions I have are: Has anyone else used M10 Workhorse yeast or is this symptomatic of contamination?
I don't understand the OP!

Where is the contamination?

Or do you just have a weird fermentation profile?
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 27, 2016, 11:30:19 PM
Ultimately that's what I'm asking : Has anybody with more experience than me ever experienced such a "weird fermentation profile"?
Title: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Leann ull on May 27, 2016, 11:39:00 PM
Next question how are you measuring mash temp with, what was temp of strikewater
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 28, 2016, 09:01:03 AM
All done in a Grainfather, so strike water @ 65C but constantly circulating and thermostatically controlled. Mash out  @75C, held for 10 minutes and sparged @ 75 C.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: krockett on May 28, 2016, 10:48:52 AM
I usually mash at 65 or lower using WLP090 and never got below 1.008 - even using glucose also.

Have read about people finishing that low but it seemed to be a characteristic of the yeast mutating - it happened across batches (was US-05 he was re-using I think)..
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 28, 2016, 05:14:08 PM
Thanks. everybody, for participating. Taste is a little too bitter and there's a slight tang of plastic. I'm dumping it.
Title: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Leann ull on May 28, 2016, 08:15:51 PM
I'm gutted when folks have to chuck beer especially after 4-5 hours brewing but if it's infected it's the right thing to do.
Now let's help you out.
What's your regime for water as you can get plastic taste from chlorinated water but I think you got an infection.
Please also look at your bucket sanitation or better still throw out that bucket as you may have had a wild infection.
Clean and sanitise the arse out of your gf chilling coil a couple of days before your next brew.
Better luck with the next one.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: nigel_c on May 28, 2016, 09:59:09 PM
I wouldn't consider 65 too low. A 25 min mash though might be cutting it a bit short.
I'm not 100% on the grainfather setup but do you add the grain and then bring it up to temp or add grains to the 65+ adjusted strike temp? If its the case you bring up to temp you may have spent too long in beta rest area and then went to mash out making a very fermentable wort. Combined with a high attenuating yeast it ripped through it.
Fermenter may have gotten a nudge at day 10 or so and came back to life. To me it doesn't sound infected. Just put it down as one of those things and try learn from it.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Archsnapper on May 29, 2016, 05:09:14 PM
I think I'll invest in a stainless steel fermenter.
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: SkiBeagle on May 31, 2016, 08:10:16 PM
Good call - easy to clean/sanitise/sterilise. And it doesn't have to cost a fortune. A corny keg can be used (about €40 or so from THBC) with a spunding valve to stabilise the pressure (€25-35). A stainless pot with an airlock in the lid is another even lower-cost option. I have a stainless conical which is great, but I tend to brew low-grav beers, so they finish in a few days. If I'd known how little time they spend in the conical, I'd have bought a corny or a pot.
Good luck with the next brew. I knocked over a pot and lost a great brewday's worth of beer. Jesus wept! Then I had to go and clean it up.
Get back in the saddle!
Ski
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: darren996 on June 01, 2016, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: Archsnapper on May 29, 2016, 05:09:14 PM
I think I'll invest in a stainless steel fermenter.
Good call, you won't regret it and it is a long term investment. I use a 33 litre stock pot from Bergland.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: Qs on June 01, 2016, 08:18:57 PM
Quote from: SkiBeagle on May 31, 2016, 08:10:16 PM
Good call - easy to clean/sanitise/sterilise. And it doesn't have to cost a fortune. A corny keg can be used (about €40 or so from THBC) with a spunding valve to stabilise the pressure (€25-35). A stainless pot with an airlock in the lid is another even lower-cost option. I have a stainless conical which is great, but I tend to brew low-grav beers, so they finish in a few days. If I'd known how little time they spend in the conical, I'd have bought a corny or a pot.
Good luck with the next brew. I knocked over a pot and lost a great brewday's worth of beer. Jesus wept! Then I had to go and clean it up.
Get back in the saddle!
Ski

Isn't a corny keg a bit small for fermenting a standard sized batch in?
Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: darren996 on June 01, 2016, 09:49:57 PM
Too small, no head room, 15 or 16 max in a corney..

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Is this beer contaminated?
Post by: SkiBeagle on June 02, 2016, 01:13:57 PM
That's what the spunding valve is for - so you can fill 18L or so and let the valve handle the blowoff/pressure.
There's a massive thread about pressurised fermentation in HomeBrewTalk:
http://www.homebrewtalk.com/showthread.php?t=44344
Some people see advantages in it. Never tried it, but I'm tempted to try natural carbing in the keg.