National Homebrew Club Ireland

Brewing Discussions => All Grain Brewing => Topic started by: garciaBernal on September 14, 2016, 11:47:10 AM

Title: No sparge.
Post by: garciaBernal on September 14, 2016, 11:47:10 AM
Just for convenience and a bit of time saving for a midweek brew I'm going to chance a single infusion no sparge mash this evening. What am I looking at about a 3% loss in brewhouse efficiency? And am I using the same amount of water I would have used in my batch sparge including losses etc. but just all in one go? Doing a 20L batch and have a 50L mash tun so should be fine. Anyone else ever use this method? I've read there is no difference in quality so long as you don't mind a couple percent loss of efficiency.
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: wallacebiy on September 14, 2016, 02:10:01 PM
First beer I ever did , I used this method ,
Didn't work out very well ( I was an absolute beginner though )
Low alcohol and not a complete conversion in the mash so caused incessant potty trips .
( Still it was the best beer I'd ever made at that time !!)
It was BIAB so I may have not controlled mash temp sufficiently and could have killed off enzymes .
Sean Billings convinced me after that , that Sparging was the way forward .. ( although I still toy with the idea of
doing a big beer and a small beer sometime ...)

How much time do you think you will save ? Could you save the same time by running off your first runnings earlier than an hour ?( if you have a ph meter you can check the mash at 35 -40 mins and see if conversion has happened then your good to start batch / Flysparging then )
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: oblivious on September 14, 2016, 02:14:57 PM
When I have done it, I set my efficiency to 50%
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: garciaBernal on September 14, 2016, 02:33:20 PM
Quote from: wallacebiy on September 14, 2016, 02:10:01 PM
First beer I ever did , I used this method ,
Didn't work out very well ( I was an absolute beginner though )
Low alcohol and not a complete conversion in the mash so caused incessant potty trips .
( Still it was the best beer I'd ever made at that time !!)
It was BIAB so I may have not controlled mash temp sufficiently and could have killed off enzymes .
Sean Billings convinced me after that , that Sparging was the way forward .. ( although I still toy with the idea of
doing a big beer and a small beer sometime ...)

How much time do you think you will save ? Could you save the same time by running off your first runnings earlier than an hour ?( if you have a ph meter you can check the mash at 35 -40 mins and see if conversion has happened then your good to start batch / Flysparging then )

I usually use an iodine test to see if conversion is complete. I regularly check pH but not for conversion purposes. It could be converted in 30 mins to 45 mins. I reckon I'll save about half an hour to 45 minutes from a 5hr 30min brewday using no sparge.  I usually leave for 60 minutes anyway though.
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Slev on September 14, 2016, 02:48:52 PM
Very apt one here:
http://brulosophy.com/2016/08/29/mash-methods-pt-2-batch-sparge-vs-no-sparge-exbeeriment-results/

And there was a basic brewing podcast on it very recently too.

Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: garciaBernal on September 14, 2016, 02:50:14 PM
Quote from: Slev on September 14, 2016, 02:48:52 PM
Very apt one here:
http://brulosophy.com/2016/08/29/mash-methods-pt-2-batch-sparge-vs-no-sparge-exbeeriment-results/

And there was a basic brewing podcast on it very recently too.

It was this experiment that put it in my head alright.
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Slev on September 14, 2016, 02:59:10 PM
The main dude from brulosophy  says he does the no sparge method for most of his experiments. 
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Qs on September 14, 2016, 03:40:18 PM
I was no sparging a lot before I got my new bigger kettle. My efficiency dropped a lot at the start but I learned that giving the mash a few good stirs, say one every 10-15 minutes really helped. Its a very handy way to brew. As well as the time saving you have less to do during the mash so you can relax a bit more while preparing for the boil, etc
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Slev on September 14, 2016, 03:42:51 PM
Biab,  basically -  well apart from not using a bag,  it's basically biab. ..... and using more than one vessel. But apart from those,  it's biab
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: garciaBernal on September 14, 2016, 03:53:34 PM
Quote from: Slev on September 14, 2016, 03:42:51 PM
Biab,  basically -  well apart from not using a bag,  it's basically biab. ..... and using more than one vessel. But apart from those,  it's biab

I never BIAB'd but I always thought the grains were sparged in BIAB no?
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: wallacebiy on September 14, 2016, 04:35:56 PM
Let us all know how you get on anyway !!!
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Slev on September 14, 2016, 04:50:42 PM
Typically,  the full volume of water is used for the mash.  At the end of the mash, (or raise to mash out temp)   just pull the bag,  give a little squeeze,  and continue to the boil.
The odd person,  holds back a small quantity of water to sparge with. 
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: pob on September 14, 2016, 08:16:51 PM
You can also look up 'Full Volume Mashing' - this is what you are doing with BIAB.

No sparge & all in one vessel are two of the benefits (speed & convenient) of BIAB.
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Fal on September 14, 2016, 09:02:56 PM
Anyone know How do you set up a no sparge profile on beersmith
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Leann ull on September 14, 2016, 09:10:07 PM
You can edit the water volume in the mash screen, double click on the stage and it will open a new window. I do it a lot for herms
Title: Re: No sparge.
Post by: Fal on September 15, 2016, 12:53:09 AM
Brilliant cheers CH